The core of law is JUSTICE.
A simple word, easy to say. But, how easy it truly is to implement it in our life???
Then comes to the term CORRUPTION, the extraordinary crime that threatens the veins of our country based upon the Indonesian legal culture.
"Power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupt absolutely." -Lord Acton.
So what corruption truly is???
According to Robert Kligaard, the formula of corruption is C=M+D-A
Corruption=Monopoli+Discretion-Accountability
The main question is, what are we gonna do with all those tyed rats a.k.a coruptors???
Here I am, proposing the punishment of what I personally believe will be effective to eradicate corruption slowly but sure (it is not as easy as blinking eyes, is it?), to give deterrens effect in order to provide justice for all as it is stated in Pancasila as the staatsfundamentalnorm of Indonesia, the fifth principle that says, "Social justice for whole Indonesian citizens"
According to the statement of the vice-chief of Corruption Eradication Commision (KPK), Busyro Muqaddas, corruption creates mass poverty.
So the punishment we can give is by making the corruption defendant poor, by taking all of his assets and wealth. Because philosophically, corruptors do not afraid of the state, do not afraid to die they afraid even terrified of being poor that is why they do corrupt.
But apart from that, after we take all of his property, we sentence him to death penalty. So it is not only him who feels the effect but his wife and kids also. Because death penalty itself would never be enough to get deterrens effect if corruptors have saved their money all around the world that guarantees his family and descent will live prosper. It is as if he sacrifises himself for the sake of his family. That is why death penalty itself is not enough unless accompanied by making the corruptors poor so people would think twice before doing corruption. This hopefully would erase corruption slowly.
As Deny Indrayana had stated that corruption is crime against humanity. Because of corruption, state could not respect, protect and fulfil its citizens' human rights.
So let us take an eye for an eye. We would not make the whole world blind, Gandhi. We are seeking for justice using the eye of heart.
Mean? No! Certainly no.
Law is harsh but that is law.
-Dion
1/10/2013
Why students do not feel at home on campus?
Regarding the title mentioned above, maybe some of you would think that it
is not an important topic to discuss but it actually is for me. No doubt,
campus is written in our agenda on almost every single week day since it is our
obligation to go there. Why? Simple, no study > no diploma > no job > no life. Sometimes duty feels harder to
do than right; as a prove, you would feel extremely happy when you hear “Bu
Aroma kosong” or even “Pak Zainal kosong”, well that’s heaven, because going to
their class is actually our duty, and we just lose one of our duties, then we
are glad for that. Now imagine, when your friends say “we have an extra class
for islamic belief on Saturday at 7”, well that’s hell! Why is that? Because we
have a new duty.
So here’s the thing, it is stupid actually when feel excited because of our
lecturer isn’t able to come to the class, why? Because we hava paid, well our
parents did, so we have right to obtain their teaching class certain times per
certain semester and when we lose it, we lose our right then. What are we
supposed to feel then? Is it happiness? Maybe it’s because when we have no
class, means we don’t have to go to campus, because I’d rather to go home or go
to another place and hang out with some friends, and this thing really
corelates with the title I put: why students do not feel at home on campus?
Let’s analyze why such thing happens in our campus!
Relize it or not, it could be due to the lack of space or
places for students during the free time. Starting from the simplest thing;
seeing our tiny little canteen is just annoying enough, its just non sense! I think
it was built without even considering the sum of students. Too crowded, too
many people, unorganized, not well maintained, whereas it should be a place for
students to have lunch together before then they can discuss something together,
and have a really good time so that they feel comfortable being in this campus,
but it’s just not happening.
There’s another thing; there should be places for students
in a compfortable area where we ca do relaxing, take a look at the picture
below
Well maybe it’s too impossible to reach now but we may
reflect to the campus of economy where they have enough such kind of places. It’s
unfair guys! We do need more facilities.
Besides, we actually have several UKM in our faculty, but
unfortunately, campus doesn’t provide any place devoted for them. They need to
borrow a room first before they can do their activity. Besides, maybe some of
you haven’t heard about Sekretariatan Bersama (SEKBER), it’s a forum of all the
members of UKM, it’s made so that people from UKM can get along each other,
know each other, but again no place available, it’s harder for them to run this
then. So, sekber has not officialy made yet. This is sad, especially when we
know that sekber has already their own place in kampus terpadu. Plus, the
backyard which is supposed to be futsal and basketball courts now is just
transformed to the parking lot. It has been happening since years ago, and
there’s still always no any resolution from the head of our faculty.
But overall, the worst thing ever which keeps us bound in
such condition is the students itself. Why? Most of the students now seem
indifferent knowing problems existing in their own faculty. Maybe some of them
haven’t even heard about any problem on campus because they don’t want to know,
maybe they never socialize, so they never hear stories from other people. Or maybe
saying some of them have known about certain cases in our campus, but they don’t
care. Maybe for them, it’s not their business, because what they need to do is
just study, then graduate. That’s all. So what’s the different then from siswa
to MAHAsiswa?
But I do realize that me myself, I can’t blame them, it’s
their choice, and they are free to choose. So it’s our duty then to suggest
them, to move them, to encourge them for togeher struggling in our beloved campus.
Lots of people would be more worthful than just few of people in facing the
head of the faculty to tell them our willingnes in order to achieve our
welfare. Let’s make this beloved campus comes alive! Make our campus our home.
Love, F.A
Women 'to blame' for being raped?
A third of Britons believe a woman who acts flirtatiously is partially or completely to blame for being raped, according to a new study.
More than a quarter also believe a woman is at least partly responsible for being raped if she wears sexy or revealing clothing, or is drunk, the study found.
One in five think a woman is partly to blame if it is known she has many sexual partners, while more than a third believe she is responsible to some degree if she has clearly failed to say "no" to the man.
In each of these scenarios a slightly greater proportion of men than women held these views - except when it came to being drunk, when it was equal.
In fact more women (5pc) than men (3pc) thought a woman was "totally responsible" for being raped if she was intoxicated.
Support groups described the findings as "alarming" and "appalling".
The national charity Victim Support urged criminal justice professionals and healthcare workers to "consider how best to educate people about the terrible impact of rape, with a view to changing these attitudes."
The ICM opinion poll, commissioned by Amnesty International, also revealed that the vast majority of the British population has no idea how many women are raped every year in the UK.
Almost all, 96 per cent, of respondents said they either did not know the true extent of rape or thought it was far lower than the true figure.
Only 4 per cent even thought the number of women raped exceeded 10,000. The number of recorded rapes in 2004/5 was more than 12,000 and the 2001 British Crime Survey estimated that just 15 per cent of rapes come to the attention of the police.
'Rape is an appalling crime'Amnesty International UK director Kate Allen said the poll, part of its Stop Violence Against Women campaign, had uncovered "disturbing attitudes".
She said: "It is shocking that so many people will lay the blame for being raped at the feet of women themselves and the government must launch a new drive to counteract this sexist 'blame culture'."
The research had also exposed the scale of public ignorance over the true extent of rape crimes in the UK and the "dreadfully low" conviction rates, she said.
"The government has an international duty to prevent this gross human rights violation yet it's clear that the government's policies on tackling rape are failing and failing badly," she said.
"These findings should act as a wake-up call to the government to urgently tackle the triple problem of the high incidence of rape, low conviction rates and a sexist blame culture."
Joanna Perry, policy manager at Victim Support, said: "It is alarming to read that so many people seem to believe that a woman is responsible for inviting a rape or sexual assault, because of what she was wearing, what she drank or how she behaved.
"Rape is an appalling crime and has a devastating effect on victims, and those close to them. In other words, nobody asks to be raped."
source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html
I have heard for the past few months about this issues, where women are said to be partially responsible/blamed for some rape cases. Some said that it's the woman's fault that they are being a victim of rape, since their outfits were very revealing. I want to know your opinions and thoughts about this. No particularly based on the article above. I'm sure there are a lot of articles and issues you have read all over the internet or that you have read in newspaper, maybe. I want to know my classmates' (aka you) opinions and thoughts because you are all way smarter and have broader mind than me, I want to learn from you so that someday I could make a better post than this.
In my opinion though, the victims of rape are not always sexy or easy girls who flirt with strangers or just give hint to everyone that they want to be teased. Sometimes the most well dressed, well behaved and neat women are the victim. And as the article said, no one wants to be raped. Putting aside the religion's obligation to wear veil and covering the aurat, I think to say that women shouldn't wear revealing clothes is a very different matter from this rape thing. It's shouldn't be the reason for them to be blamed if they're victimized by rapists. I cannot put my sentences well, I'm sorry. All I'm saying is, it's true that women should wear more neat, polite clothes that only show a little bit of their skin, and that they should not be out alone at late night, but they are not obligated to do it either. And when they do it, I think the reason should be because they are well aware of the danger and possibility in the society and neighborhood and of course their own common sense that women should be graceful, classy and well behaved.
And if, some women have not found their path onto that thought yet, it is not right of those red eyed men with evil intentions to take advantage of them. They should be the one having the protective feeling and respect to women. And if they don't have it, it just proves how shallow, uneducated, and how easy of them to be manipulated by their own raging libido.
A. R. M
1/05/2013
Indonesia Islamic University
And this is the second video about UII.
With the slide of Yogyakarta conditions and people.
We like if you leave some comment for us.
And the last word...
One love
Yoshimitsu Minamoto
Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia
Universitas Islam Indonesia or we can call Indonesia Islamic University is a university that implemented the value of Islam in daily activity. With the Yogyakarta's environtment around the university, this university offer the different situation and condition.
This video explaining about the situation in the campus, the facility, and the activity of the students, lecturers and officers.
UII have a plus value because the place of the university is in the middle of Yogyakarta's Region. Uniquely for Law Faculty, the place is on the middle of Yogyakarta city and if you want to have a small tour around the city, you will find the Malioboro and Pakualaman is just a several minutes from the campus if you use the motorcycles, and of course if you want to try the traditional foods and drinks, you will find that Yogyakarta is the best place.
Here is my shorts story telling about Yogyakarta environtment.
Good attitude is the value of Yogyakarta's people. You will see the fun in the city, especially in some famous place, example malioboro and kaliurang. you can compare Bali and Yogyakarta.
The weather in dry seasons is nice and fresh. When the sun is in the highest position, it will become hot, but usually if you get up early in the morning, you will find the true Yogyakarta. The fresh and good aroma of morning will make you relax and feel refresh.
When the wet seasons take place, the condition in the Yogyakarta will be more COOL and usually the rain will be pouring it's water when afternoon until morning, so be prepare your rain coat and umbrella. And don't forget to bring some plastic to make sure your shoes or your electronic does not wet.
Hope you enjoy this informations
Thank You
Yoshimitsu Minamoto
If you want to more about this university, you can visit this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_University_of_Indonesia
And for Yogyakarta informations, you can visit this site :
http://www.yogyes.com
http://www.visitingjogja.com
An Early Little Lesson of "Ultra Petita" - GEMILANG THASA
Assalamu'alaikum wr. wb.
Dear fellows,
As some of you know that me and a few of our friends from IP class are joining Forum Kajian dan Penulisan Hukum (FKPH) FH UII. Well, FKPH is holding an internal debate competition to select competitors to participate in debate competition that will be held in Unpad, Bandung.
At the second session, I was given a motion "Authority of constitutional complaint for Constitutional Court (MK)" and I was in the contra team. It is kind of a little bit hard for me because personally I am kind of fan to Mr. Mahfud MD, I support him to be the next Indonesian President also with Prabowo Subianto (I am seventeen now, I have election rights hehehe) and I am actually pro to MK.
Dear fellows,
As some of you know that me and a few of our friends from IP class are joining Forum Kajian dan Penulisan Hukum (FKPH) FH UII. Well, FKPH is holding an internal debate competition to select competitors to participate in debate competition that will be held in Unpad, Bandung.
At the second session, I was given a motion "Authority of constitutional complaint for Constitutional Court (MK)" and I was in the contra team. It is kind of a little bit hard for me because personally I am kind of fan to Mr. Mahfud MD, I support him to be the next Indonesian President also with Prabowo Subianto (I am seventeen now, I have election rights hehehe) and I am actually pro to MK.
Anyway, during the briefcase, I did find a few contra arguments of why MK should not be given this kind of authority.
One of them is "Ultra Petita".
Ultra Petita is decision made by judge more than what is actually demanded, it can also be said as decision towards a case that is not being sued.
Ultra Petita is forbidden because of these reasons:
1. The statute that is demanded to be tested is the "Heart" of the statute, so the whole sections in the statute cannot be implemented.
2. The practise of Ultra Petite done by MK is common in other countries.
3. The test towards the statute is erga omnes, different from private law.
4. The people's need of the existance of Ultra Petita is not absolute.
5. If the public necessity is wanting the judge not to be attached to the petitum, the petitum of justice is assumed to be proposed as well and disposing thing that is not demanded.
That is all I can share to you all for now, fellows. Anyway, wish me pass the FKPH selection ;)
One of them is "Ultra Petita".
Ultra Petita is decision made by judge more than what is actually demanded, it can also be said as decision towards a case that is not being sued.
Ultra Petita is forbidden because of these reasons:
1. The statute that is demanded to be tested is the "Heart" of the statute, so the whole sections in the statute cannot be implemented.
2. The practise of Ultra Petite done by MK is common in other countries.
3. The test towards the statute is erga omnes, different from private law.
4. The people's need of the existance of Ultra Petita is not absolute.
5. If the public necessity is wanting the judge not to be attached to the petitum, the petitum of justice is assumed to be proposed as well and disposing thing that is not demanded.
That is all I can share to you all for now, fellows. Anyway, wish me pass the FKPH selection ;)
Wholehearted love,
Gemi
Gemi
Dust Under Our Feet - GEMILANG THASA
Assalamu'alaikum wr. wb.
My dearest fellows,
Mayhaps this posting I make has nonstrong attachment to the law itself at all as we all are law students of a prestigious law school. But still, this one is for us anyway
I remember one certain Indonesian novel I adore (I have to inform you that, sorry, but I personally do not adore much of it!) it is, the one and only, Perahu Kertas by Dewi "Dee" Lestari which also had been adapted into movie by Hanung Bramantyo with Maudy Ayunda and Adipati Dolken as the main protagonists (weirdo Kugy and uniquely adorable Keenan) and I have to inform you that it is not as disappointing as I thought at first if a book is adapted into movie. It is indeed another Indonesian love story but it is certainly not the thing I mean to talk about here. It is one certain quote from that movie that matters:
"Dan Bumi hanyalah sebutir debu di bawah telapak kaki kita."
- Kugy Karma Chameleon
And the Earth is nothing but dust under our feet. I find that quote very interesting and suits us. I think it is the best quote to represent us all so far. Yeah, we, the IP students of UII Law Departement. We with our wildest dreams; those who want to be diplomat, those who want to have dual degree, those who want to finish study abroad, those who want to make their parents and family happy, those who want to have a job in international corporation, those who want to be international lawyer, military and so much more!
So remember this: "Once you have will to spread your wings and fly away through the big blue sky, even the Earth's gravity has no enough strenght to pull you back to the ground."
Let us race, fastabiqul khairats, and go reach our dreams! Wingspeed, fellows!!!
Wholehearted love,
Gemilang Thasa
IPFOL UII 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
